文章摘要
分类发展视角下研究生课程建设的现状及路径优化——基于某“双一流”建设高校的实证分析
Status Quo and Path Optimization of Postgraduate Curriculum Development from the Perspective of Classified Development——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey in a Double First-class University
投稿时间:2025-01-10  
DOI:10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2025.02.06
中文关键词: 分类发展;课程建设;研究生教育;实证分析
英文关键词: classified development;curriculum development;postgraduate education;empirical analysis
基金项目:中国研究生院院长联席会2021年研究生教育重大课题“研究生课程建设、教材建设及其质量提升研究”(ACGS03-2021002)
作者单位
熊玲 华南理工大学 研究生院, 广州 510641 
卢开聪 华南理工大学 研究生院, 广州 510641 
许勇 华南理工大学 研究生院, 广州 510641 
罗静慈 华南理工大学 研究生院, 广州 510641 
摘要点击次数: 175
全文下载次数: 146
中文摘要:
      基于某“双一流”建设高校即将毕业离校研究生反馈的调查数据,从分类发展视角对研究生课程建设的现状及影响因素进行实证分析。结果表明:对于课程目标,专业学位研究生较学术学位研究生表现出更高的认可度;在课程结构方面,学术学位和专业学位研究生修读的课程仍存在趋同性;在课程实施方面,配套教材、课程思政、教学方法等因素对课程认可度产生显著的正向影响;在课程评价方面,两类研究生普遍关注考核方式的合理性。因此,研究生培养单位应在课程建设全链条进一步推进研究生课程的分类建设。
英文摘要:
      Based on the survey data of soon-to-be-graduated postgraduates at a double first-class university, this study conducts an empirical investigation and analysis of the status quo of postgraduate curriculum development and its influencing factors from the perspective of classified development. The results show that in terms of curriculum goals, professional postgraduates have higher recognition than academic postgraduates; in terms of curriculum structure, the courses taken by academic postgraduates and professional postgraduates are still of homoplasy; in terms of curriculum implementation, factors such as supporting materials, curriculum-based ideological and political education, and teaching methods have a significant positive impact on curriculum recognition; and in terms of course evaluation, both types of postgraduates are concerned about the rationality of evaluation methods. Therefore, this paper suggests that postgraduate trainers should further promote the classification of postgraduate courses in the whole chain of curriculum construction.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮