文章摘要
生源差异如何影响博士学位论文质量?——基于全数据的研究
How Does Quality Difference of Doctoral Applicants Determine the Quality of Their Doctoral Dissertations? A study based on full data
投稿时间:2018-11-23  
DOI:
中文关键词: 博士研究生教育;学位论文质量;生源质量
英文关键词: doctoral education;quality of dissertation;quality of doctoral applicant
基金项目:中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题"‘三位一体’研究生学位论文质量评价与监测体系研究"(编号:A2-2015Y0407-011)
作者单位
郭海燕 北京师范大学 研究生院, 北京 100875 
刘春荣 北京师范大学 研究生院, 北京 100875 
张志斌 北京联合大学 师范学院, 北京 100101 
摘要点击次数: 1474
全文下载次数: 3816
中文摘要:
      博士生招生质量对保障教育质量具有基础型、决定性的作用。保障招生质量的关键在于有效地进行生源甄别。文章采用博士学位论文匿名评审量化结果作为衡量培养质量的核心指标,运用统计分析方法,按照总体、分学科大类,分析生源差异对学位论文质量的影响。研究表明,录取方式、录取类别、考生身份等对博士学位论文质量有显著影响。为此,在招生中,应大幅度增加硕博连读和本科直博生的比例;同时,应进一步压缩定向生比例,特别是要严控招收定向在职攻读人员中非教学科研岗位人员。人文学科的学科特点突出,应重在对考生个性化特点的深入考察。
英文摘要:
      The quality of newly admitted doctoral students plays a fundamental and decisive role in ensuring the quality of education. The key to ensuring the admission of high-quality applicants is to have a more effective evaluation procedure for admission. This paper adopts the quantitative results of the anonymous doctoral dissertation evaluation as the core indicators to measure the cultivation quality and uses statistical analysis method to analyze the influence of student source differences on the quality of doctoral dissertations in the overall and discipline categories. The study shows that the quality of doctoral dissertations is obviously impacted by the admission method, the admission category and the identity of the applicants. Therefore, the authors propose that the admission proportions of successive master-doctor and undergraduate-doctor students should be increased by a large margin, and the proportion of target-area students should be further reduced. In particular, it is necessary to strictly control the admission of target-area applicants who are not teaching and research personnel. Because the disciplinary characteristics of humanities are strong, the authors particularly propose deep consideration on the personal ability and characteristics of the applicants in evaluation.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮