|
| 教育学科如何适应“双一流”建设——基于中美研究型大学教育学科建设比较研究 |
| How does Education Discipline Adapt to the “Double First-class” Construction? A Comparative Study on Educational Discipline Construction in Research Universities between China and USA |
| 投稿时间：2017-11-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 双一流;教育学科;研究型大学;中美比较 |
| 英文关键词: “double first-class”;education discipline;research university;comparison between China and the United States |
| 基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关课题"世界一流大学和一流学科建设评价体系与推进战略研究"（16JZD044） |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 周文辉 | 北京理工大学 教育研究院, 北京 100081 | | 勾悦 | 北京理工大学 教育研究院, 北京 100081 | | 李明磊 | 北京理工大学 教育研究院, 北京 100081 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2394 |
| 全文下载次数: 2342 |
| 中文摘要: |
| “双一流”建设背景下，我国研究型大学教育学科的发展面临危机与挑战。从机构载体、培养层次、学科专业设置、师资力量四个部分比较中美研究型大学教育学科的建设情况。基于我国现实情况，借鉴美国研究型大学教育学科发展经验，我国教育学科发展应注重跨学科研究，构建学科生态群；要扎根本土打造特色，发挥服务功能，以适应"双一流"建设。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Under the background of "Double First-class" construction, the development of education disciplines in research universities of China faces risks and challenges. This paper makes a comparative study on the institutional carriers, cultivation levels, discipline course provisions and faculties between the research universities in China and in the United States. Based on the practical conditions in China and by learning the experience of research universities in the United States in developing education discipline, this paper proposes that China should pay more attention to the interdisciplinary studies in education discipline development, facilitate discipline "ecological" clustering, and give full play to local characteristics and service functions, so as to better adapt to the "double first-class" construction. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
