|
| 跨学科博士学科认同的危机与重构 |
| Identity of Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programs:Crisis and Reconstruction |
| 投稿时间：2014-09-12 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 跨学科博士;学科认同;危机;重构 |
| 英文关键词: interdisciplinary doctoral program;identity;crisis;reconstruction |
| 基金项目:江苏省研究生培养创新工程2014年度入选项目"高校自主设置二级学科的自律机制及实现路径研究". |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 关辉 | 南京信息工程大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 210044 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1590 |
| 全文下载次数: 4049 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 跨学科博士教育是培养高水平创新人才、促进学科交叉的重要途径,而跨学科博士却面临明显的学科认同危机,具体表现为自我认同危机、同行认同危机、社会认同危机等三个方面。学科制度刚性及其局限性、后现代主义学派的仓促解构以及博士评价体系的固化与偏执是导致危机的根源,重构学科认同是跨学科博士教育可持续发展的重要基础。重构学科认同不仅需要跨学科博士自身确立获得认同的坚定目标,更需要营造宽容的人才认同环境,最终依靠跨学科与学科的统一。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Despite its importance in training high-level innovative talents and promoting interdisciplinary studies, interdisciplinary doctoral education faces an identity crisis as in self-identification, peer recognition and social acknowledgment. The root causes of the crisis are a rigid system of disciplines with its limitations, hasty post-modernist deconstruction and an intolerant doctoral evaluation system. Reconstructing the identity of disciplines is an important basis for the sustainable development of interdisciplinary doctoral education, which requires both a firm goal in its own identification and a supportive environment with eventual unity of interdisciplinary studies and other disciplines. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
