|
| 中美两国交叉学科目录与人才培养的比较 |
| A Comparative Study of the Interdisciplinary Catalogues and Personnel Cultivation between China and the United States |
| 投稿时间：2025-02-20 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2025.03.12 |
| 中文关键词: 交叉学科目录;人才培养;中国;美国 |
| 英文关键词: inter-disciplinary catalogue;personnel cultivation;China;the United States |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金社科学术社团主题学术活动项目(22STA010);中国高等教育学会重大委托课题(2022ZD03) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 张炜 | 西北工业大学 高等教育研究中心, 西安 710072 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 17 |
| 全文下载次数: 23 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 交叉学科的概念丰富而又复杂。本研究回顾、梳理交叉学科及其相关概念形成的历史脉络和基本内涵,对比分析中美两国交叉学科目录设置情况、发展态势和人才培养的侧重点,并从坚持以人才培养为中心、优化交叉学科知识体系、积极开展科学研究和社会服务三个方面阐述发挥交叉学科作用的路径。在此基础上提出我国交叉学科的发展思路,即深化学科专业综合改革,完善自主设置政策,以推动交叉学科可持续、高质量发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The concept of interdiscipline is rich and complex. This study reviews and sorts out the concept of interdisciplines, compares the interdisciplinary catalogues and personnel cultivation in China and the United States, andanalyzes the role the interdiscipline has played from the three aspects of adhering to personnel training as the focal point of the work, improving the quality of teaching, and carrying out scientific research and social service. On this basis, this paper puts forward the development ideas of interdisciplines in China,namely, to deepen the comprehensive reform of disciplines and specialties and improve the independent setting, so as to promote sustainable development of interdisciplines. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
