|
| 博士生领导力何以形成:基于“环境-关系”模型的分析 |
| The Formation of Doctoral Student Leadership:An Analysis Based on the "Environment-relationship" Mode |
| 投稿时间：2024-07-03 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2025.02.01 |
| 中文关键词: 博士生领导力;高层次人才;社会变革模型;模型构建;内涵特征 |
| 英文关键词: doctoral student leadership;high-level talent;social change model;modelling;connotation characteristics |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 吴敏 | 四川大学 公共管理学院, 成都 610065 | | 李媛媛 | 四川大学 公共管理学院, 成都 610065 | | 万学红 | 四川大学 华西临床医学院, 成都 610065 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 255 |
| 全文下载次数: 132 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目前我国学界对博士生领导力的概念内涵、形成机理及构成维度的研究还相对薄弱,不足以回应现阶段国家对拔尖创新人才培养的现实需求。以社会变革领导力模型、社会认知理论、关系型领导理论为基础,以价值实现为目标,立足"环境—关系"视角,构建了一个解释博士生领导力形成过程和维度内容的模型,推导出博士生领导力由胜任力、影响力和创新力三个维度构成。在此基础上分析出高素质人才培养的本质属性、高水平科技创新的核心目标、高品质场域协同的基本形式、高质量教育发展和高层次产业转型的环境诉求共同构成了博士生领导力及其"环境—关系"模型的内涵特征。模型给出的博士生领导力形成和发挥的理论解释框架,有助于指导博士生领导力的塑造,推进博士生教育培养目标的重塑、培养内容的完善和培养模式的优化,也为评价博士生教育和博士质量提供了一个参考标准。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| At present,the research on the concept connotation, formation mechanism, and constituent dimension of the doctoral student leadershipin China is still relatively weak, which is insufficient to meet the current national demand for training top innovative talent. Based on the social change leadership model, social cognitive theory, and relational leadership theory, and with value realization as the goal, the authors construct a model to explain the formation process and dimensional content of doctoral student leadership from the perspective of "environment-relationship". They conclude that doctoral student leadership consists of three dimensions:competence, influence, and innovation ability. Further analysis reveals the essential attributes of high-quality talent cultivation, the core goal of high-level scientific and technological innovation, the basic form of high-quality synergy of various field domains, and the environmental requirement of high-quality education development and high-level industrial transformation, which together constitute the doctoral student leadership and the connotation characteristics of the "environment-relationship" model. The theoretical framework for explaining the formation and performance of doctoral leadership provided by the model is conducive to guiding the formation of doctoral leadership, promoting the transformation of the goals of doctoral education, improving the training contents, and optimizing the training modes. In addition, it also provides a certain reference standard for evaluating doctoral education and the quality of doctoral students. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
