|
| 专业学位研究生校外实践导师协同治理研究——基于第三方组织行动视角 |
| Research on Collaborative Governance of Professional Degree Postgraduates’ Off-campus Practice Advisors:Based on a Perspective of Third-party Organizational Actions |
| 投稿时间：2024-08-27 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2025.01.10 |
| 中文关键词: 专业学位研究生;第三方组织;校外实践导师 |
| 英文关键词: professional degree postgraduates;third-party organization;off-campus practice advisor |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金"专业学位研究生导师协同治理机制创新研究"(22YJA880055);国家新文科项目"国际认证标准引领下的行业高校新文科内部质量保障体系构建研究"(2021210004);辽宁省研究生教育教学改革研究项目"专业学位研究生校外实践导师多元融合协同治理研究与实践"(辽教通〔2022〕249号-217);大连海事大学研究生教育教学改革项目"产教融合视角下专业学位研究生内部质量保障体系建构研究"(YJG2023523) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 王诺斯 | 保山学院 教育学院, 云南 保山 678000
大连海事大学 高等教育研究院, 辽宁 大连 116026 | | 石宇杰 | 吉林外国语大学 教育学院, 长春 130117 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 319 |
| 全文下载次数: 276 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 第三方组织介入专业学位研究生校外实践导师协同治理是推进产教协同育人、提升专业学位研究生培养质量的有益探索。当前的实践导师协同治理存在着形式化、短期化、低效化、偏离化的现实困境,而第三方组织的介入可以促使当前的封闭秩序向契约秩序转化,并实现权力冲突的调和、交易活性的激发与企业参与意愿的增强。在可行性上,第三方组织受职能责任的驱动介入,而这种介入行为的合法性来自其社会权力,校企双方出于价值共创愿意与其黏合成协同治理共同体,数智技术强化了介入的可操作性。在实践进路上,第三方组织可以在实践导师协同治理"选用育评"各环节发挥功用,通过标准化选拔、定制化提升、契约化行动、系统化考核,实现实践导师协同治理的共生、共创、共享。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The involvement of third-party organizations in the collaborative governance of off-campus practice advisors for professional degree graduate students is a beneficial exploration to promote industry-education collaboration in talent cultivation and enhance the quality of training for professional degree graduate students. The current collaborative governance of practice advisors faces practical dilemmas such as formalization, short-termism, inefficiency, and deviation. The intervention of third-party organizations can facilitate the transformation of the current closed order to a contractual order, and achieve the reconciliation of power conflicts, the stimulation of transactional activity, and the enhancement of corporate participation willingness. In terms of feasibility, third-party organizations are driven by their functional responsibilities to intervene, and the legitimacy of this intervention comes from their social power. Both schools and enterprises are willing to cohere with them into a collaborative governance community for value co-creation, and digital technology has strengthened the operability of the intervention. In terms of practical approach, third-party organizations can play a role in each link of "selection, training, and evaluation" of practice advisors’ collaborative governance. Through standardized selection, customized improvement, contractual action, and systematic assessment, they can achieve symbiosis, co-creation, and sharing in the collaborative governance of practice advisors. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
