文章摘要
2000—2020年国内教育博士培养研究文献述评
A Systematic Review of the Research on Domestic Ed.D Education (2000-2020)
投稿时间:2021-10-15  
DOI:10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2021.06.01
中文关键词: 教育博士培养;思辨研究;实证研究;内容分析法
英文关键词: Ed.D education;speculative research;empirical research;content analysis
基金项目:吉林省高等教育教学改革研究重点课题"教育博士UGS协同培养模式研究";北京社会科学基金重点项目"我国在线教师教育体系建设研究"(20JYA001)
作者单位
秦春生 东北师范大学 研究生院, 长春 130024 
宋萑 北京师范大学 教师教育研究中心, 北京 100875 
摘要点击次数: 411
全文下载次数: 423
中文摘要:
      本研究以2000年至2020年为限,对国内教育博士培养研究相关文献进行梳理与归纳,并分析研究中基本假设、论证逻辑、证据质量和假定影响。研究发现,20年间,我国教育博士培养研究发文量呈波动增长态势;研究对象范围广泛、类别丰富、数量分布变化大;研究范式呈现明显的"思辨色彩",实证研究较为薄弱;研究方法以比较研究和质性研究为主,量化研究方法运用较少;研究内容重复性特征明显,主题没有及时跟上国家教育事业发展需要;大部分研究都缺乏适切的理论支撑且多半借用了西方的理论或框架,缺乏对中国本土脉络的观照。未来应增加理论研究与培养实践的关联,丰富研究主题、扩大研究者队伍、开展实证研究、拓宽研究方法。
英文摘要:
      With the data ranging from 2000 to 2020, this present research sorts out and summarizes the literature relating to the domestic studies of Ed.D education, and analyzes the basic hypotheses, logic of argument, quality of evidence and assumed influence of the studies. The research finds the following phenomena:the number of published academic papers on Ed.D education has increased in a fluctuating manner in the past 20 years in China; the range of research objects is in a broad category with noticeable changes in quantity distribution; the research paradigm presents an obvious feature of speculation. But, the empirical research is comparatively weak; the methods used are mainly comparative and qualitative researches, yet the quantitative research method is seldom applied; the research contains apparent repeated contents and the subjects cannot keep up with the needs of national education development; and most of the researches lack proper theoretical support, and most of papers use western theories or frameworks, lacking the study of the theoretic development in China. Therefore, the authors propose that in the future, we should increase the study on the correlation between theoretical research and training practice, enrich research subjects, expand research team, carry out empirical research, and broaden the field of research methods.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮