文章摘要
为思维而教 构建研究生课程教学“金课”
Teaching for Thinking: on Postgraduate Curriculum “Golden Course” Construction
投稿时间:2019-03-27  
DOI:
中文关键词: 研究生;课程教学;"金课"
英文关键词: postgraduate;curriculum teaching;"golden course"
基金项目:江苏省教育科学规划课题"高校教师与学生学习共同体建设研究"(D/2016/01/10)
作者单位
毛景焕 南京航空航天大学 高等教育研究所, 南京 210016 
摘要点击次数: 3040
全文下载次数: 4523
中文摘要:
      课程教学作为研究生培养体系的第一模块,是学生从接受式学习向研究性、自主性学习转变的黄金期,对形成学生的研究能力和思维能力具有不可或缺的作用。目前研究生教育存在着严重的重科研、轻教学的现象,在课程教学中出现内容缺乏整体性思维,重参与、轻深度,重成果展现,轻思维交流,评价的反馈性和区分度不足等问题。研究生的培养同样需要"金课"的滋养,在课程教学中体现以需求性为导向的内容设定、整体性的问题创设、交互性的思维展示和指引性、真实性的评价反馈等特点,着重在内容重构、回归现实、思维交互展现、过程数字化等方面进行改进,以切实提升研究生的教学质量。
英文摘要:
      As the first module in the postgraduate training system, course teaching is the golden period for students to change from receptive learning to research-oriented and autonomous learning. It plays an indispensable role in forming students' abilities in research and thinking. At present, there is a serious phenomenon in postgraduate education featuring an excessive emphasis on scientific research but less attention paid to teaching. Particularly in course teaching, there are such existing problems as lack of holistic thinking in the content, excessive emphasis on participation but less in-depth involvement, excessive emphasis on achievement display with less attention to idea exchanges, and lack of feedback and categorization in evaluation. The postgraduate education also needs the nourishment of "golden course" and the teaching of the course should embody the characteristics of a demand-oriented content setting, the questions in overall design, the display of interactive thinking, and the guiding line and authenticity of evaluation feedback. The author believes that the focus should be on the improvement of content reconstruction, real problem explanation, display of interactive thinking, and process digitization so as to enhance the teaching quality for postgraduates.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮