|
| 权威的可谬性:学位论文评审规则的当下隐忧 |
| Fallibility of Authority: Present Worries about Dissertation Review Rules |
| 投稿时间：2018-11-14 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 权威;权威的可谬性;学位论文;评审规则 |
| 英文关键词: authority;fallibility of authority;dissertation;review rules |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 李尚群 | 湖南农业大学 教育学院, 长沙 410128 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1351 |
| 全文下载次数: 3613 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 学术权威即具有较高学术声望和较强学术评判能力的人。研究生的学位论文必须接受并通过学术权威的系列评审，这是当下的普遍规则。权威在学术活动中有可能出错，科学社会学把这称为权威的可谬性。权威的可谬性会降低学位论文评审规则的合法性，同时也影响了学位论文评审制度的效率，因而是这一规则自带的一种隐忧。为了规避权威的可谬性及其影响，研究生学位论文的评审规则可以进行某些改进，如增设当事人商榷环节、慎用刚性的定论式评价、推行精准的同行评价和各评价环节相互印证与牵制等。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| An academic authority is a person with a high academic reputation and strong academic judgment. Currently, it is a universal practice that postgraduate dissertations must be subject to reviews by several academic authorities. An authority may also make mistakes in academic activities, and sociologists call this the fallibility of authority. The fallibility will not only reduce the legitimacy of the dissertation review rules but also affect the efficiency of the dissertation review system. Therefore, the rules actually carry a kind of hidden negative elements that make people worry about. To avoid the fallibility of authority and its consequences, the author suggests to take some measures to improve the review rules, such as to add a consulting period for the parties concerned, to be prudent with rigid and deterministic evaluation remarks, to introduce a accurate peer-review system, and to confirm and contain mutually among the authorities at different review phases. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
