文章摘要
一流学科建设的三种导向:价值的冲突与统一
Conflict and Unity of Values, and the Three Guiding Principles in the First-class Discipline Construction
投稿时间:2018-11-05  
DOI:
中文关键词: 一流学科建设;导向;价值冲突
英文关键词: first-class discipline;guiding principle;value conflict
基金项目:国家社科基金重点项目"基于学科生产能力提升的一流学科建设路径与策略研究"(18AGL021);教育部人文社会科学规划项目"基于学科点的一流学科建设的微观研究:知识生产模式转变的视角"(17YJA880015)
作者单位
刘小强 江西师范大学 教务处, 南昌 330022 
彭颖晖 江西师范大学 马克思主义学院, 南昌 330022;江西科技师范大学 研究生院, 南昌 330013 
摘要点击次数: 181
全文下载次数: 106
中文摘要:
      一流学科建设涉及政府、高校和学者三个主体,不同主体基于不同的立场有不同的价值取向,从而在实践上形成了一流学科建设三种不同的导向:政府的服务导向、高校的排名导向和学者的成果导向。三个主体追求不同,三个导向旨趣各异,严重削弱了一流学科建设的成效。知识转型带来学科建设的转型,一流学科建设必须坚持服务导向。在服务导向下实现三个主体价值取向的统一,需要政府确保相关政策在服务导向上的一致和统一,需要高校改变学科建设的管理方式和科研评价办法。
英文摘要:
      The first-class discipline construction involves three entities, namely, government, university, and scholar. Based on different standpoints, the different entities have different value orientations, which lead to three different guiding principles for the construction of the first-class disciplines in practice, i.e. the service guiding principle of the government, the ranking competition guiding principle of the university and the accomplishment guiding principle by scholars. The different pursuits and different interests guided by the principles of the three entities have seriously weakened the effectiveness of the first-class discipline construction. As knowledge transformation has brought about the transformation of discipline construction, the first-class discipline construction must adhere to the service guiding principle. In order to achieve a unity of the three value orientations under the service guiding principle, the government needs to ensure the consistency and unification of relevant policies in service guiding principle, and the university needs to improve the management methods and evaluation methods on scientific research in discipline construction.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮