|
| 我国省属高校管理科学与工程学科发展现状与趋势分析 |
| Analysis of the Development Status quo and Trend of the Management Science and Engineering Discipline at Provincial Universities |
| 投稿时间：2020-10-04 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2020.06.10 |
| 中文关键词: 省属高校;学科建设;双一流;管理科学与工程;学科评估 |
| 英文关键词: provincial universities;discipline construction;double first-class;management science and engineering;discipline evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 王海燕 | 浙江工商大学 管理工程与电子商务学院, 杭州 310018 | | 陈达强 | 浙江工商大学 管理工程与电子商务学院, 杭州 310018 | | 瞿焱 | 浙江工商大学 管理工程与电子商务学院, 杭州 310018 | | 向剑勤 | 浙江工商大学 管理工程与电子商务学院, 杭州 310018 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2220 |
| 全文下载次数: 4976 |
| 中文摘要: |
| "双一流"建设为省属高校学科建设与发展创造了新的机遇，省属高校可借此机会缩短自身与部属重点大学在部分学科上的差距。本研究以管理科学与工程学科（以下简称管工学科）为例，基于青塔"学科云数据平台"的学科指标数据，分析省属高校与部属高校及管工一流学科高校的差距，并采用聚类分析与多维尺度分析法，探讨省属高校管工学科发展的特点与趋势。研究发现，省属高校管工学科因发展水平差异被分为两大类，即：各方面发展均较差的高校和在某些方面有优势的高校，前者的学科评估排名下滑严重，而后者则能维持或提升。师资队伍与平台建设是省属高校普遍存在的短板，但东部沿海发达地区部分高校因在奖励与资源投入上有充足的经费保障，却在这两个方面有优势；管工学科发展历史悠久的传统高校学科发展优势更多体现在人才培养、社会服务与学科声誉等方面。省属高校应根据自身特点，因地制宜地制定管工学科发展策略，不断提升学科发展水平。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The "double first-class" construction has created new opportunities for the discipline construction and development of provincial universities that can take this opportunity to shorten the gap between them and key universities directly under the Ministry of Education in some disciplines. Centering on the management science and engineering disciplines, and based on the data of the disciplinary evaluation indexes of the "Discipline Cloud Data Platform" under Qingta, this study analyzes the gap between provincial universities and universities directly under the Ministry of Education, as well as the universities that have first-class management and engineering disciplines. In addition, this study also resorts to cluster analysis and multi-dimensional scaling analysis and finds the characteristics and trends of the provincial universities in developing their management science and engineering disciplines. According to the findings, provincial universities can be divided into two categories due to different stages in development, i.e. generally less developed universities and universities having outstanding advantages in some aspects. The former ones have a serious decline in subject evaluation rankings, while the latter ones can maintain its places in the rankings or develop rapidly. Faculty building and platform construction are the common shortcomings of provincial universities, but some universities in the developed eastern coastal areas have sufficient funding guarantees for rewards and resource input. Therefore, they are quite prominent in scientific research, teaching team and platform construction. The advantages of traditional universities with a long history of developing management science and engineering disciplines are manifested in personnel training, social service and reputed disciplines. This paper proposes that provincial universities should consider their own characteristics, formulate development strategies for management science and engineering disciplines, and continuously improve the development of the disciplines. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
