|
| 博士学位论文评审指标体系可靠吗——基于全数据的信度和效度研究 |
| On Reliability of Doctoral Dissertation Review Indicator System: A study based on reliability and validity of all data |
| 投稿时间：2019-06-10 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2020.01.12 |
| 中文关键词: 博士学位论文评审;指标体系;信度分析;效度分析 |
| 英文关键词: doctoral dissertation review;indicator system;reliability analysis;validity analysis |
| 基金项目:中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题“‘三位一体’研究生学位论文质量评价与监测体系研究”（编号：A2-2015Y0407-011） |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 刘春荣 | 北京师范大学 心理学部, 北京 100875 | | 郭海燕 | 北京师范大学 学位办, 北京 100875 | | 吴瀚霖 | 北京师范大学 信息科学与技术学院, 北京 100875 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1972 |
| 全文下载次数: 5509 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 论文评审是学位论文质量评价的重要环节。为了使评审结果能真实地反映博士学位论文的质量和水平，必须首先保证论文评审指标体系的准确性、可靠性和有效性。信度和效度分析是验证指标体系准确性、可靠性和有效性的重要方法。文章利用北京师范大学五年博士学位论文匿名评审全数据量化结果，对评审指标体系的信度和效度进行实证研究。结果表明，目前广泛采用的评审指标体系具有良好的信度和效度，能够真实地反映博士学位论文的质量和水平。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Dissertation evaluation is an important link in the dissertation quality evaluation. In order to ensure that the evaluation results can truthfully reflect the quality of the doctoral dissertation, we must ensure the accuracy, reliability, and validity of the dissertation evaluation indicator system and the reliability and validity analysis is an important method to verify the accuracy, reliability, and validity of the indicator system. The authors use the outcomes of the full data quantification of the anonymous doctoral dissertation evaluation at Beijing Normal University in the past five years to carry out an empirical study on the reliability and validity of the system. The results show that the evaluation indicator system widely applied is fairly reliable and valid, which can truly reflect the quality and standard of doctoral dissertations. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
