|
| 高校有组织科研：形成要素、实施困境及路径对策 |
| Organized Scientific Research at Higher-Learning Institutions: Formation Factors, Implementation Difficulties, Paths and Counter-measures |
| 投稿时间：2023-11-22 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2024.02.07 |
| 中文关键词: 有组织科研;高校;行业特色高校 |
| 英文关键词: organized scientific research;higher-learning institutes;universities with industrial features |
| 基金项目:上海市教育科学研究项目"上海高校哲学社会科学研究"(2023ZSD012) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 胡兵 | 华东理工大学, 上海 200237 | | 甘晖 | 陕西省社会科学界联合会, 西安 710068 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 197 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 有组织科研已成为高校深入推进"双一流"建设、承担五大基本职能的关键内容。高校加强有组织科研,必须准确把握其形成要素,科学认识其功能定位。从国际、国内高校推进有组织科研的实践来看,积累了一些可供参考的经验,形成了一些共性的特点,但也仍然存在使命导向的价值理念尚未深入人心、现有科研管理机制存在障碍、评价体系还没有形成等现实困境。不同类型高校在推进有组织科研路径上存在较大差异,就行业特色高校而言,要加强有组织科研战略谋划、明确主攻方向,创新有组织科研运营机制、实行颠覆性改革,推动学科交叉体系建设、凝练学科优势,优化科研资源分配形式、集中优势资源,突出战略科学家的主导地位、培育创新人才,重构科研成果评价体系、破除恶性竞争。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Organized scientific research has become the key task for universities to further promote the double first-class construction and give full play to the five basic functions. To strengthen organized scientific research, colleges and universities must fully understand its forming factors and scientifically know its function orientation. From the practice of international and domestic universities in promoting organized scientific research, we can see that some experience has been accumulated that can be used as reference and some common features have been formed. However, there are still some practical difficulties, such as the mission-oriented values have not been fully accepted, some obstacles exist in the present scientific research management mechanism, and the evaluation system has not yet been formed. There are great differences in different types of universities in pushing forward organized scientific research. When it comes to industry-featured universities, the authors suggest that we should strengthen the strategic planning for organized scientific research, and identify the main task to be worked on; improve the operation mechanism for organized scientific research, and carry out disruptive reforms; promote the construction of an interdisciplinary system, and consolidate the advantages of disciplines; optimize the distribution of scientific research resources, and concentrate advantageous resources; highlight the leading position of strategically important scientists, and cultivate innovative professionals; and reconstruct the scientific research achievement evaluation system, and get rid of malignant competition. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
