|
| 研究生写作：如何从“照着讲”转向“接着讲” |
| Postgraduate Academic Writing: How to Transform from “Following the Text” to “Continuing the Topic” |
| 投稿时间：2022-11-26 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2023.05.05 |
| 中文关键词: 学位论文;研究生写作能力;研究型学术写作 |
| 英文关键词: dissertation;postgraduate writing ability;research-oriented academic writing |
| 基金项目:国家哲学社会科学重大项目"西方科学思想多语种文献编目与研究"(14ZDB019) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 安维复 | 上海交通大学 马克思主义学院, 上海 200241 | | 杨广明 | 清华大学 马克思主义学院, 北京 100084 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 531 |
| 全文下载次数: 725 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 当前研究生学位/学术论文写作的难题乃在于难以实现从文献综述到理论创新的突破,因而提高研究生学术写作能力的关键就在于寻找从文献综述到理论创新的实现路径。本文基于国内外学术写作各种规范的考察,遵循"正题-反题-合题"的辩证法思想,藉此阐发文献综述与理论创新之间的学术理路:"正题"就是对所述文献的深度理解与辩证反思;"反题"就是对所述文献进行经验批判或前提性批判;"合题"就是在"扬弃"所述文献的基础上形成自己的判断。简言之,理论创新就是对所述文献的"扬弃","通古今之变"与"成一家之言"是可以沟通的,"照着讲"与"接着讲"的关系是辩证的。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The current problem of postgraduate degree/academic thesis writing is that it is difficult to achieve breakthrough from literature review to theoretical innovation. Therefore, the key to improve the academic writing ability of postgraduates lies in discovering the path that leads from literature review to theoretical innovation. Based on the investigation of various norms of academic writing at home and abroad and following the dialectic thought of "thesis-antithesis-synthesis", this paper elucidates the academic path between literature review and theoretical innovation: the "thesis" here means deep understanding and dialectical reflection on the mentioned literature; the "antithesis" stands for criticism on the mentioned literature in an empirical or preemptive manner; and the "synthesis" is the formation of one's own judgment on the basis of "sublation" of the mentioned literature. In short, theoretical innovation is the sublation of the literature. "A thorough understanding of the changes in the past and at present" can lead to "an academic view of one's own". The relationship between "following the text" and "continuing the topic" is dialectical. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
