|
| 研究生学籍超期清退“五问”及规范化路径 |
| Five Questions and Standard Procedures for Withdrawing Student Status of Postgraduates Who Failed in Scheduled Graduation |
| 投稿时间：2022-10-21 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2023.04.11 |
| 中文关键词: 研究生教育;学籍清退;学籍管理;受教育权;现代大学制度 |
| 英文关键词: postgraduate education;student status withdrawal;student status management;the right to education;modern university system |
| 基金项目:上海市地方高水平大学和一流研究生教育创新计划系列项目"研究生教育质量监控工作的制度逻辑与实践策略研究"(JYCX-2020-059) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 缪志心 | 华东政法大学 研究生院, 上海 200042 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 637 |
| 全文下载次数: 849 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 研究生学籍超期清退日益进入大众视野。一方面,研究生学籍超期清退具有提升研究生教育质量,降低研究生教育成本,给予研究生多样化选择等价值意蕴,另一方面,研究生学籍超期清退本质上剥夺了研究生继续现有学业,顺利毕业,取得研究生学位的机会,又给高校与研究生发生争议预留了空间。当前,研究生学籍超期清退存在着权力来源、法律依据、法律性质、正当实施以及是否可诉等问题,为此,提出研究生学籍超期清退的规范化路径,即:基于法律保留原则进行研究生学籍超期清退实质合法性之修正,基于正当程序原则开展研究生学籍超期清退形式合理性之补强,基于教育治理现代化推进研究生学籍超期清退参与主体正当性权益之平衡,以实现既能维护研究生的受教育权,又能推进研究生教育高质量发展之目的。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The student status withdrawal of postgraduates who failed in scheduled graduation now appears in the public view. On the one hand, the withdrawal has the value implication of improving the quality and reducing the cost of postgraduate education, and giving the students diversified choices; on the other hand, the withdrawal essentially deprives the students of the opportunities to continue their current studies, to graduate finally, and to obtain a postgraduate degree. In addition, it also leaves room for disputes between universities and postgraduates. At present, there are some problems for the withdrawal, such as the authorization, legal basis, legal nature, proper execution and whether it is actionable. Therefore, the author proposes a standard path for withdrawal, that is, to revise the substantive legality of the withdrawal based on the principle of legal reservation, to strengthen the rationality of the withdrawal form based on the principle of due procedures, and to balance the legitimate rights and interests of postgraduates whose student status is to be withdrawn based on the modernization of education governance. The author believes that only in this way, can we achieve the goal of both safeguarding the right of postgraduates to education and promoting the high-quality development of postgraduate education. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
