|
| 取消“博士论文发表要求”的再审思——基于“三角协调模式”的视角 |
| Rethinking on the Cancellation of “Dissertation Publication Requirement”: Based on the Triangular Coordination Model |
| 投稿时间：2021-12-20 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2022.01.09 |
| 中文关键词: 博士论文发表要求;学术评价;三角协调模式;量化标准;破"五唯" |
| 英文关键词: requirements for doctoral thesis publication;academic evaluation;triangle coordination mode;quantitative standards;break the "five only" |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 杨庭颂 | 东南大学 人文学院, 南京 211100 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 991 |
| 全文下载次数: 2896 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 博士论文发表要求引起的争议使其成为联结教育理论与评价实践的现实论题。其根本价值在于提升培养质量、促进知识生产创新，但在教育实务中的运行机制表现为：目标置换、学术竞争、行政管理和功能锁定。究其机理，评价路径的过度依赖、评价标准的"学术GDP主义"、评价结果的"利害攸关"强化了内卷现象。实践表明："一刀切"地废除"博士论文发表要求"并不可取。基于"三角协调模式"提出因应之方在于三方协调推进：学术层面需要科学确定多维度评价标准，健全多层次、差别化评价体系；市场层面需加强学术评议指导，落实第三方主体职责；行政层面落实分流疏导机制，提升高层次人才培养质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The controversy caused by the "dissertation publication requirement" makes it a realistic subject linking educational theory and evaluation practice. The fundamental value of the requirement is to improve the training quality and promote the innovation in knowledge production, but the performance of the operation mechanism in educational practice shows: target replacement, academic competition, administrative management and function fixation. After probing into the mechanism, the author finds that the over-dependence on the evaluation path, the "academic GDP-ism" in evaluation criteria and the stake in the evaluation have only strengthened the phenomenon of involution. Practice manifests that it is not advisable to abolish the "dissertation publication requirement" in a "one-size-fits-all" manner. Based on the triangular coordination model, the author proposes that the solution is to coordinate the three factors in promoting: the reasonable determination of a set of multi-dimensional evaluation standards so as to improve the multi-level and differentiated evaluation system at the academic level; the strengthening of academic evaluation guidance so as to give full play of the third party at the market level, and the implementation of the diversion mechanism so as to improve the quality of high-level personnel training at the administrative level. The author believes that further research can help reduce the risk of evaluation bubble, and provide reference for the building of the basic theory of the academic degree system and judicial practice in China. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
