文章摘要
学科评估对高校组织实践的影响——从制度逻辑再出发
The Influence of Discipline Evaluation on the Organization and Practice Work at Higher Education Institutions: From the Perspective of the Institutional Logic
投稿时间:2021-01-25  
DOI:10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2021.03.11
中文关键词: 教育质量评估;学科评估;制度逻辑;高等教育质量
英文关键词: education quality assessment;China University Subject Rankings (CUSR);institutional logics;higher education quality
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"‘一带一路’背景下的来华留学政策执行成效、问题及对策研究"(18YJC880056)
作者单位
刘水云 北京师范大学 教育学部, 北京 100875 
赵彬 北京师范大学 教育学部, 北京 100875 
摘要点击次数: 382
全文下载次数: 401
中文摘要:
      在第五轮学科评估有序开展以及"双一流"建设快速推进的背景下,亟需审视学科评估这一重要手段对提升高等教育质量的实际效用,因此本文选取W大学作为个案,以制度逻辑为理论视角,采用质性研究方法探讨学科评估对组织实践的影响。研究结果表明,W大学以资源分配与学科调整、吸引优质师资、激励科研产出以及边缘化考量社会服务与人才培养四项组织实践策略回应这一价值评估工作。进一步分析发现,组织中以管理主义为轴心的绩效优先的简化逻辑、制度性同形的逻辑以及劳动控制的逻辑三重制度逻辑并存。而组织理性化的策略引发了非理性的意外后果,学科评估对提升高等教育质量的预期效用尚未完全达成。
英文摘要:
      When the fifth China University Subject Rankings (CUSR) being carried out in an orderly manner and the "double first-class" construction in fast progress, it is necessary to examine the actual effect of CUSR that is regarded as an important means in improving the quality of higher education. Therefore, based on the theoretical perspective of institutional logic, this paper takes W University as a case to study the impact of the CUSR on organized practical work with the qualitative method. The result shows that W University responds the CUSR with four organized practice strategies, i.e. resource allocation and discipline adjustment, high-quality teacher recruitment, sci-tech output encouragement, and social services and talent training measurement with marginalization consideration. Further analysis finds that three layers of institutional logics exist in the organized practice work, specifically, the simple logic of performance first with managerialism as the axis, the logic of institutional isomorphism and the logic of labor control. In conclusion, the authors point out that the expected effect of the CUSR on improving the quality of higher education has not yet been fully achieved as the rational strategies for organized practice work has triggered some irrational and unintended outcomes.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮