文章摘要
研究生学术不端行为治理的制度构建与完善——基于985工程大学文本分析
System Construction and Improvement for Governing Academic Misconduct of Postgraduates: Based on the document text analysis of the universities of Project 985
投稿时间:2019-01-22  
DOI:
中文关键词: 研究生学术不端;985工程大学;制度构建
英文关键词: postgraduate academic misconduct;Project 985 universities;institutional construction
基金项目:贵州省研究生教育教学改革重点课题"法治视域下研究生学术不端行为治理规范体系的构建研究"(黔教合YJSCXJH2018(013))
作者单位
李祥 贵州师范大学 教育学院, 贵阳 550025 
王路路 贵州师范大学 教育学院, 贵阳 550025 
摘要点击次数: 1522
全文下载次数: 4986
中文摘要:
      完善高校学术规范制度是治理研究生学术不端的重要环节。综合分析38所985工程大学研究生学术不端治理文本后发现,当前高校在研究生学术不端治理的制度构建上主要体现在治理依据、治理原则、治理内容、治理程序、惩治方式等五个方面,较为全面。但也存在一些共性问题,一是文本内容表述不一,认定、惩戒标准失衡;二是制度设计缺陷,主动治理意识不足;三是教化性特征不显,学生权益保障不移;四是"重处罚、轻预防"。完善研究生学术不端治理制度需强化高校主动治理意识、构建系统化治理机制、重视治理程序正义、优化惩戒实施以及改变功利性评价机制。
英文摘要:
      Improving the system of academic norms at higher learning institutions is an important link in the governance of academic misconduct of postgraduates. After a comprehensive analysis of the documents introduced by 38 Project 985 engineering universities in relation with the governance on academic misconducts of postgraduates, the authors find the anti-misconduct systems of higher learning institutions are comparatively complete, covering five aspects in general, namely, governance basis, governance principles, governance content, governance procedures, and punishment measures. However, there are some similar problems: 1. different descriptions in documents and unlinked punishment with conviction; 2. deficient system design and lack of active governance awareness; 3. obscure warning function without depriving the rights and interests of the students who have committed misconducts; and 4. "too much stress on punishment but negligence of prevention". The authors conclude that to improve the system of governance on postgraduate academic misconduct, we need to strengthen the active governance awareness of the universities, build a systematic governance mechanism, attach importance to the justice of governance procedures, optimize the execution of punishment and change the utilitarian evaluation mechanism.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看
分享按钮