|
| 世界一流学科建设中期绩效考核评估研究 |
| Study on Mid-term Performance Assessment in Developing World-class Discipline |
| 投稿时间：2017-12-27 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 世界一流学科;中期建设;绩效考核;评估等级考核表 |
| 英文关键词: world-class discipline;mid-term in development;performance assessment;assessment rating scale |
| 基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"世界一流大学和一流学科建设评价体系与推进战略研究"（编号：16JZD044） |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 刘瑞儒 | 延安大学 教育科学学院, 陕西 延安 716000
北京理工大学 教育研究院, 北京 100081 | | 何海燕 | 北京理工大学 教育研究院, 北京 100081 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2282 |
| 全文下载次数: 4187 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 双一流大学建设的核心是一流学科建设。加强学科建设中期绩效考核评估是促进世界一流学科早日建成的有效途径。提出了世界一流学科建设中期绩效考核评估体系建立的基本依据、原则、思路和方法；明确了评价指标遴选来源，确立了从学科建设指导思想、师资队伍、科研成果、人才培养、社会服务与文化传承、国际视野、建设条件、学科组织及学科声誉等9个角度21个一级指标、38个二级指标及其相应的评估考核标准；构建了具有中国特色的世界一流学科建设中期绩效评估等级考核表；为国家制定一流学科中期建设绩效考核方案提供参考建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The core of the double first-class university development is the first-class discipline development. To strengthen the mid-term performance assessment in the discipline development is an effective way to realize an early completion of the world first-class discipline development. This paper puts forward fundamental basis, principles, ideas and methods for the establishment of a mid-term performance assessment system for the development of the world first-class disciplines, clarifies the source of assessment indexes selected and establishes 21 first-grade indexes, 38 second-grade indexes and corresponding assessment criteria from 9 viewpoints such as those of the guiding ideology for the development of the discipline, faculty development, scientific research outcomes, personnel training, social services and cultural heritage, international vision, construction conditions, discipline organization and discipline reputation. This paper also develops an assessment rating scale for the mid-term performance assessment for the world first-class discipline development with Chinese characteristics and proposes some suggestions for the state when it formulates mid-term performance evaluation standards. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
