|
| 俄罗斯副博士学位论文评阅模式及其合理借鉴 |
| Russian Kandidat Nauk Dissertation Reviewing Mode and Its Referable Experience |
| 投稿时间：2016-07-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 俄罗斯副博士学位论文;评阅模式;合理借鉴 |
| 英文关键词: Russian Kandidat Nauk Dissertation, reviewing mode;properly referring |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 黄思记 | 安阳师范学院 教育学院, 河南 安阳 455000 | | 李申申 | 河南大学 教育科学学院, 河南 开封 475004 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1485 |
| 全文下载次数: 2004 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 博士学位论文的评阅与审核是保障研究生教育质量的重要环节。俄罗斯副博士学位论文评阅模式颇具特色，其突出特点表现为正式评阅与非正式评阅相结合、评阅人与评阅单位相结合、非匿名的全参照评阅等。受其启发，我们宜从建立多主体参与的评阅机制、加强评阅人与申请者之间的互动、尝试采用非匿名全参照评价方式等方面改进我国博士学位论文评阅制度，提高博士生教育质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The process of reviewing and approval of doctoral dissertation is a key link to ensure the quality of postgraduate education. The reviewing mode of Russian Kandidat Nauk doctoral dissertation is quite distinctive. It features a non-anonymous, all-reference reviewing process characterized by collaborative formal and informal readings with the participation of reviewers and reviewing units. Inspired thereby, the authors of this paper suggest that a reviewing mechanism with a participation of more parties be established to strength interaction between the reviewer and degree applicants, and that the non-anonymous, all-reference reviewing method be adopted to improve the doctoral dissertation reviewing system and enhance Ph.D. student education quality in China. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
