|
| 研究生教育质量评价研究的现状、特征及展望——基于对1986-2016年研究文献的述评 |
| On Current Situation, Characteristics and Prospect of Postgraduate Education Quality Evaluation Research——Based on the review of the research literature in 1986-2016 |
| 投稿时间：2016-07-16 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 研究生教育;质量评价;评价指标 |
| 英文关键词: postgraduate education;quality evaluation;evaluating indicator |
| 基金项目:中国学位与研究生教育学会2015年立项研究课题“研究生导师的职责、考核、评价及激励机制研究（课题编号：2015Y0801） |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 王海英 | 华东师范大学 教育学部, 上海 200062 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1779 |
| 全文下载次数: 2646 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 评价主体、方法与指标内容是研究生教育质量评价体系的主要方面，本文梳理近三十年我国研究生教育质量评价体系方面的文献发现，研究生教育质量评价主体从原初政府、社会和高校各自为政转向多元主体的合作；评价方法上自我评价法与外部同行评价法相结合，且越来越强化在实际评价中二者之间的互补；另外，评价指标的类型化与专业化日益突出，但相应的研究主要为理论设计，充分的实证建构较为缺乏。因而未来研究与实践应注重运用实证研究的方法，建立科学有效的评价指标，逐步形成多元参与、协商、发展式的评价体系。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Evaluating entities, methods and indicators are the main aspects of the postgraduate education quality evaluation system. After reviewing the academic literature on the evaluation of postgraduate education quality in the past three decades, the author found the evaluating entities have changed from government agencies, institutions or organizations of the society, and higher learning institutions that did the job separately to a multi-entity body doing the job cooperatively. In terms of the methodology, it is now a kind of combination between self evaluation and external peer evaluation, and it trends more complementary to each other between the two in practical work. In addition, the evaluating indicators are being more prominently categorized and specialized. Unfortunately, corresponding research and study mainly focus on theory design, and there is limited full empirical construction. Therefore, the author suggests, in the future, use the empirical method in research and practice, establish a scientific and effective evaluation indicator system and gradually form an evaluation system featuring multiple participation, frequent consultation and ever evolution. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
