|
| 公平与质量:推荐免试研究生制度的矛盾与平衡 |
| Impartiality and Quality: Balances and Checks in Enrollment of Exam-exempt Students |
| 投稿时间：2015-04-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 推荐免试;研究生;招生;公平;质量 |
| 英文关键词: enrollment of exam-exempt student;postgraduate;admission;impartiality;quality |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 陈立章 | 中南大学 研究生院, 湖南 长沙 410083 | | 蒋清华 | 中南大学 研究生院, 湖南 长沙 410083 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1789 |
| 全文下载次数: 3911 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 我国推免生工作中存在着公平与质量的矛盾问题,或者为保证质量而牺牲公平,或者为维护公平而影响质量。参考社会科学中公平与效率的关系理论,招生的公平与质量应该是一种统一的、互动的关系。应以推免工作中学生、接收单位(含导师)两个主体的需求为视角,通过扩大有推荐权的高校范围,扩大推荐比例,增加一个独立的网上报考志愿阶段,给"211工程"高校之外的推荐高校增加"推免补偿名额"等改革措施,努力寻求公平与质量的平衡。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| There exist contradictions as to the impartiality and quality in university enrollment of exam-exempt students. Impartiality is sometimes sacrificed for the sake of quality or vice versa. According to the equity-efficiency theory, impartiality and quality in student enrollment should be uniform and interactive. From the perspectives of students and receiving schools (including supervisors), a balance should be achieved between impartiality and quality by increasing the number of schools capable of admitting exam-exempt students and the number of students thus enrolled, establishing an independent online application platform, and providing an additional enrollment quota for non-"Project 211" colleges and universities. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
