文章摘要
高校学科群:演进机理、具体样态与实践选择
Evolutionary Mechanisms, Specific Forms and Practice Choices of Discipline Groups in Universities
投稿时间:2025-06-07  
DOI:10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2025.06.11
中文关键词: 学科群;演进机理;样态;实践
英文关键词: discipline cluster;evolutionary mechanism;specific form;practice
基金项目:中国研究生院院长联席会探索项目"以科研能力为重的研究生培养模式理论研究与改革实践"(ACGS05-2024015)
作者单位
梁传杰 武汉理工大学, 武汉 430070 
张凌云 武汉理工大学, 武汉 430070 
李媛 武汉理工大学, 武汉 430070 
摘要点击次数: 852
全文下载次数: 370
中文摘要:
      学科群的生成是基于学科与环境及其他学科在信息、资源等方面的不断交流,选择当下最合适的行为规则与其他学科以及环境相互作用的结果,不同的行为规则导致了不同的交互,造就了学科群发展主导逻辑的差异。学科群发展的主导逻辑主要包括内涵提升、特色发展、卓越引领。以发展逻辑为主线,将高校学科群划分为八种样态,分别是基本功能驱动型、学部制驱动型、前沿领域驱动型、科技变革驱动型、支柱产业响应型、战略性新兴产业响应型、未来产业响应型和社会创新响应型。它们在结构功能、生成、发展等方面呈现出了不同的特征。高校在学科群样态选择上需要从"动态平衡、协同进化、可持续发展"三方面统筹兼顾,在具体样态转型上需要坚持问题导向、目标导向和改革导向。
英文摘要:
      The formation of discipline groups is based on social demand and continuous exchanges of information and resources between disciplines. As the groups choose the most appropriate existing behavior rule to interact with other disciplines while also considering societal requirements, they may develop different dominant logics, as different behavior rules lead to different interactions. The dominant logic of developing a discipline group mainly includes connotation upgrading, characteristic development and excellence guidance. Taking the development logic as the main line, the authors classify the groups into eight types: basic function-driven, faculty system-driven, technological frontier-driven, sci-tech reform-driven, pillar industry-responsive, strategic emerging industry-responsive, future industry-responsive, and social innovation-responsive. These types of discipline groups demonstrate different characteristics in terms of their structure, function, formation and development. Regarding the form selection for a discipline group, the authors suggest that universities pay equal attention to "dynamic balance, coevolution and sustainable development" and adhere to the "problem-, goal- and reform-oriented" principle.
查看HTML全文 查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

手机扫一扫看